Monday, June 20, 2011

queen elizabeth i

images Queen Elizabeth II Queen queen elizabeth i. to Queen Elizabeth I for
  • to Queen Elizabeth I for



  • battineni
    07-13 11:05 AM
    Thanks for the information. I believe I have to wait for another month to get any updates from the Sep visa bulletin or wait till same time next year since my PD is Mar-06.

    Congrats to all to have received it and good luck to those who have become current !
    TooClose,

    Don't worry you will get it soon....!!

    I'm waiting for these dates from long longgggggg time....:-((





    wallpaper to Queen Elizabeth I for queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth I by Ilse
  • Queen Elizabeth I by Ilse



  • saravanaraj.sathya
    03-10 03:02 PM
    There is nothing to worry. You should be fine. IT does not really depend on your specific skills. If you move to another position as systems analyst with diferent technical skills it should not matter. So long as you are in the same/similar occupation as defined in ONET job code.

    Ve fun

    Guru's

    I have a small doubt on AC -21 especially the same / similar interpretation. in Perm Application there are two places where there is job description. One is Section H field 11 ( Job Opportunity/ job duties) and other one is Section F field 2 ( Prevailing Wage/ SOC code) now both define what the job is the Section H is company specific and Section F is list of USCIS codes under which this particular job falls as subset.

    The question is will USCIS judge using section F or Section H for same/ similar interpretation because Section F is pretty Generic and as long as you are in same field it works example in IT if you were say DBA and now data modeler or Systems Analyst or coder they are pretty much same. Here is an example of one such code

    15-1051 Computer Systems Analysts
    Analyze science, engineering, business, and all other data processing problems for application to electronic data processing systems. Analyze user requirements, procedures, and problems to automate or improve existing systems and review computer system capabilities, workflow, and scheduling limitations. May analyze or recommend commercially available software. Exclude persons working primarily as "Engineers" (17-2011 through 17-2199), "Mathematicians" (15-2021), or "Scientists" (19-1011 through 19-3099). May supervise computer programmers.

    But in case they try to interpret Section H is it very complex and has specific tools that can get outdated or obselete with time. So it will be difficult to do an Ac -21 with that Example if they mention SQL Server or Ab-Initio in section H and now you take a full time in company using Oracle or Informatica will that cause an issue?





    queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth I
  • Queen Elizabeth I



  • sc3
    10-18 10:32 PM
    Kumar:
    Don't worry, I gave you green. I wish 'critiques' are out in open for discussion to get to our objective. But those moroons like hiding

    Just imagine the cowardice of these people!. Online forums already have sufficient anonymity that you dont have to reveal your true name. Despite that people hide behind comment system to give reds (and tell things like "you suck" and what not). I hope the admins shut down this misused feature. Or make the system non-anonymous so that we can drag out these people and take up their comments in open forum.





    2011 Queen Elizabeth I by Ilse queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth I
  • Queen Elizabeth I



  • eb3retro
    08-18 08:52 PM
    Alright retro I'm sorry I upset you so much,it was not a remark which was meant to be taken seriously.I know there is no difference in intelligence between the two.Hope you will get cheered now and maybe drop in for a beer sometime.And I hope you get you green card soon too.


    thanks for the beer offer, but i dont drink..just an fyi - i got the receipts long back..



    more...


    queen elizabeth i. Portrait, Queen Elizabeth I
  • Portrait, Queen Elizabeth I



  • anilsal
    12-11 03:44 PM
    I think USCIS is under department of homeland security.

    Department of State is mainly for travel.





    queen elizabeth i. QUEEN ELIZABETH 1
  • QUEEN ELIZABETH 1



  • ganguteli
    02-03 11:00 AM
    In the current economic environment, removing country quota seems like the only argument that can fly, since it does not increase actual visas.

    In the current economic envireonment where H1Bs are being blamed in media do you think anything can fly. There is so much anti-India sentiment in the softare industry due to consulting companies. Do you think they will want more Indians as greencard holders? Think about it?

    I think the first step should be to do a media campaign and clear all negative publicity H1Bs are getting. Second, all of us working for consulting companies and feel they are exploited need to come out and file lawsuits against employers and clean the system. If there is no exploitation and it is only a misinformation campaign by anti-immigrants then we need to clear that wrong too so that foriegn workers get their due recognition for helping this economy grow.



    more...


    queen elizabeth i. Hanover Queen Elizabeth II
  • Hanover Queen Elizabeth II



  • bugmenot
    06-12 08:37 PM
    Jeo laal Jeo.... I totally agree with you. I want to see these h1 b restrictions that have been applied in the CIR pass. It will be fun...

    I do not think that they above restrictions will be in the CIR bill for H1-Bwhen it passes. We know, the tech companies know and most of the law makers know that they need us.. There will be an H1-B increase, restrictions removed and there will be a provition made in parallel to the merit system for EB green cards.

    Our job is to get backlog relief.. How we do it is the question....

    dont count on the restrictions being removed, the restrictions are the trade off to the major increase that is goin to take place for the h1b's , the biggie US companys are not gonna get affected by them, its only the indian IT and the desi bodyshoppers, so they wil support it as long as they get the h1b's.





    2010 Queen Elizabeth I queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth II Queen
  • Queen Elizabeth II Queen



  • file485
    12-22 07:34 PM
    thanks UN for the reply..

    what can I say..!! lost sleep for many days,but now there is nothing I can do and just hoping all will be positive...

    now with a labor filed in 2003,485 in 2007 and the PDs rolled back to 2000 god knows when our GC misery ends..The GC sponsoring employer will help with all the letters we need...if our dates become current in another 2 yrs..so 2009 - 2003 i.e 6yrs gap between the labor and GC adjuctication, will this raise an eyebrow of the IO officer...? the GC sponsoring employer is a 80 million $ construction company..

    also another question..I see conflicting opinions about letting USCIS know bout the change in job and using AC21...some say wait till RFE and some say send a letter upfront..what is the best option..? also if we use AC21 do we still need to show that we have intentions to join the original GC sponsored employer A or the latest GC sponsor becomes the AC21-ed company..


    jeez ..so stressed out of this GC mess..
    pls let us know..



    more...


    queen elizabeth i. Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I
  • Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I



  • kpchal2
    07-18 10:01 AM
    what should we ask them for if we call, 'coz they might not have entered our file in their system yet.

    Is it possible to ask them if they have the file with them and ask them to do a name check on the applications or some kind of relevant information related to the application. i am sure they should have put the files some where with some easy to identify tags. can some one call the uscis, i am planning to do with the nexy 40 min as that is when it is 8 here in the pacific coast :-)





    hair Queen Elizabeth I queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth I of England
  • Queen Elizabeth I of England



  • kaisersose
    07-24 02:05 PM
    If I-140 has been certified OR application has already been submitted, then maybe you DO need a employment letter - to prove that the job is still available.

    If I-140 and 485 are being submitted concurrently, then OBVIOUSLY there is a job offer (thats part of the reason the I-140 is filed by company) and maybe the employment letter is not required.

    My thoughts.

    You are right on both accounts.

    1. I-140 already approved: Yes. A job offer should be attached with the 485 application as the 485 is your application. Is not including the offer letter grounds for rejection for lack of initial evidence? Probably not. But it is almost certain to invoke an RFE.

    2. Concurrent Filing: As 140 is applied by the employer and not by you, that by itself is evidence that at this time, this employer intends to hire you or continue to employ you after GC. No separate letter is needed.



    more...


    queen elizabeth i. Elizabeth I, Queen
  • Elizabeth I, Queen



  • gc_chahiye
    06-03 06:30 AM
    check with your company attorneys, this is serious stuff.

    From what I understand:

    > 1) I need to maintain 1 year gap between the day I left US ( 6-Jan-07 ) and
    > the day I'm going to enter US so that I can stay in US for another 6 years on
    > H1-B. Is my understanding correct?

    correct. Technically your company can file a PERM LC right now, and you can start in October (so the year after, you can get an H1 extension based on this LC), however its much much better for you to maintain this gap and start a new H1 (its easier to change jobs when you are not dependent on extensions: you get 6 full years)

    > 2) Is it OK to go for VISA staming before 6-Jan-08?

    yes, stamping does not matter. You can get that done anytime though its recommended to get it done close (30-60 days) to your date of travel. If you get it done now, and travel on Jan 7th, make sure you carry an updated offer letter from your company in the US, reconfirming that the position is still open for you.





    hot Portrait, Queen Elizabeth I queen elizabeth i. queen elizabeth ii crowning.
  • queen elizabeth ii crowning.



  • desi3933
    03-11 11:02 AM
    The problem with this guy is he has got his GC and now he doesn't want anybody to have it. Basically he enjoys when people are having of pain. That's the reason he doesn't want any progress in PD's. Dude, if you don't like if people are talking about positve things such as "PD becomes Current" then my humble request to you is just stay-out of any converstations.


    See here this guy is also saying the same thing what my lawyer has predicted.
    http://immigration-information.com/forums/showthread.php?p=28881#post28881

    Hey Joker -

    I joined IV 5 years after getting my GC. Please look at my 900+ posts and pull out one (just one) that justify your stupid thoughts.

    If that's make you happy - PD will be current next month. Now start dreaming again.

    -- desi3933



    more...


    house of Queen Elizabeth I, queen elizabeth i. One is of Elizabeth I and the
  • One is of Elizabeth I and the



  • pyaradesi
    02-06 07:30 AM
    Kudos to Team IV for keeping the flame alive even in such a situation. If anybody noticed, IV is probably the only organization making any noise about us EB folks right now.
    Pappu and core team, awesome job, please continue with the efforts. I had a few ideas:
    1. Can we highlight past distinguished immigrants who have come thru the EB channel.
    2. The core team, can you please tell, is it realistic to expect congress to view EB separately from CIR?
    3. A lot of us here, have American managers, who would in all probability vouch for us and highlight why they want us to get a GC. We could even quantify this in dollar amounts. Can we highlight this?
    4. A flash went off in my head when I read about a march to DC, do you remember the Civil rights movement, Dr Martin Luther King Jr, can we use this great man for inspiration? After all, though our cause may not be even close to what African American suffered, there are parallels.
    5. Can we take some airtime on tv/radio to highlight H1bs? Is it a good idea? Maybe tech magazines ads?
    6. Compile a list of Congress man/women, Senators nationwide, their stance on EB quota removal, this will help us quantitatively identify where we stand.
    7. Folks, we are in a very tough adversarial situation, let us not forget that 40 od years back, if not for Civil rights movement, we would not be here.
    9. Are there any celebrities who would/could support our cause? Hollywood, u never know we may have support from the most unlikely places.

    This apart, a question to the Gurus, is the DOS visa bulletin based on DOL labors filed for that month? Does DOS confer with DOL to see how many labor certs were filed for the next month to come up with the visa bulletin? If this is the case, the visa bulletin may move at a good pace this year and next, please correct if wrong.

    IV Core team, please lead the way, even if there may not be 100% consensus.





    tattoo QUEEN ELIZABETH 1 queen elizabeth i. queen elizabeth younger
  • queen elizabeth younger



  • delax
    07-13 09:49 AM
    go figure..u jacko.. this forum is not give publicty to lawyers.
    pls close this thread


    Appreciate your comment - :) A healthy debate is beyond your reach and the ability to appreciate another view point seems to be completely missing. The last time I checked a forum is precisely for that - I am not defending or promoting anybody - Please - lets stick to Gandhian principles when we deal with each other not just with USCIS :)



    more...


    pictures Hanover Queen Elizabeth II queen elizabeth i. queen elizabeth 2nd family.
  • queen elizabeth 2nd family.



  • arnab221
    09-10 12:26 PM
    ouch that is so ironic.... 'Equine Cruelty'?? What about 'immigrant cruelty'?
    some of the priorities in this country are all screwed up...

    That shows the on what priority we are on their list . We are below horse also :D

    remember a Horse a US Citizen horse while you are not , so cruelty to a US citizen is always before cruelty to aliens .

    Man sees a woman getting chased by a dog.When the dog is about to bite the woman,
    the man intervenes and kicks the dog.
    A reporter was seeing all this.He said "That was great.
    I'll definitely publish this in newspaper.Tomorrow the headline will be
    'LOCAL HERO SAVES LADY FROM A DOG'."

    The man replied "Thank you, but I'm not from here.I am from US". Reporter " OK.
    Then the headline will be
    US CITIZEN SAVES WOMAN FROM A DOG".

    Man: Actually, I live in US but I'm not a US citizen.

    I'm a Pa****i national".
    Next day, the headline in the paper read .... .... .... .... .... .... ........ .... .... .... .... .... .... .... ....

    TERRORIST ATTACKS A LOCAL DOG



    * This Joke is copied from the internet and in no way reflects my personal feelings . This is just for having some fun and cheering us up .





    dresses queen elizabeth ii crowning. queen elizabeth i. Queen Elizabeth I of England
  • Queen Elizabeth I of England



  • studmvr
    12-13 09:25 AM
    PD-Nov03 EB2 here in Central-NJ.
    Iam in the process of letting everyone in my friends community know about IV here. Please contact me @ studmvr@yahoo.com for any help for IV.



    more...


    makeup Portrait of Queen Elizabeth I queen elizabeth i. of Queen Elizabeth I,
  • of Queen Elizabeth I,



  • seahawks
    09-10 02:10 PM
    Guys, you have to move to Florida. When my wife and son were on H4 they were paying in-state tuition.

    this is copied from the catalog of the school:

    The following categories will be considered as Florida residents for tuition purposes:


    Active duty members of the armed forces stationed in Florida, or whose home of record is in Florida, and their dependents.
    Full-time instructional and administrative personnel employed by a public educational institution and their dependents
    Qualified beneficiaries under the Florida Pre-Paid Postsecondary Expense Program.
    In addition the following nonimmigrant categories are eligible to establish Florida residency: A, E, G, H-1, H-4, I, K, L, N, 0-1, O-3, R, and NATO I-7.
    Others as permitted by state statute or rule


    If only moves were so easy wouldn't all H1's be in Florida?

    We have different laws for different states, we have states where driver license is only given for the period on your H1, we have states where SSN is required for a drivers license but your spouse cannot get a license. Please be aware of everyone's plight. We are trying to bring awareness by keeping the larger picture in mind.





    girlfriend queen elizabeth younger queen elizabeth i. queen elizabeth 11. queen
  • queen elizabeth 11. queen



  • bheemi123
    10-03 01:25 PM
    Hi friends,
    Please advise me on this situation.

    I am currently in US with L1B with Company A.
    Company B has already filed H1B petition for me.
    Assuming it gets selected & approved, Is it Possible for me to Continue with Company A after Oct1 2007 with the L1 itself.

    Thanks.


    u can be in L1 status..just go out of the contry and come back in L1b status..u r status will be autoamtically be L1 again...however u have to remember that u r h1b will be wasted...my friend did same thing last week..





    hairstyles Elizabeth I, Queen queen elizabeth i. hot queen elizabeth 11 of
  • hot queen elizabeth 11 of



  • gc28262
    08-11 05:21 PM
    Guys,

    I have thought of one more idea..

    We know very well that by current interpretation EB3 is permanently fixed to the back of the line. NO EB3 will get processed until the last EB2 who files in the year 2013 gets approved, (counting out the regular quota).

    And why are we here? Many believe (or know) that it is because of the 245(i) amnesty signed by Clinton and Bush.

    Isn't it ironic that the illegals that were put in the line are not being moved back as the line expands? Why only we legals? Maybe there is some scope to challenge the 245(i) visa number allocation and point out that legal immigrants are waiting in line then how can you admit illegals in front

    Anyone having the facts and numbers of 245(i)?

    This will need a legislative change.
    I have some information about 245(I) here EbImmigrationReference (http://ebimmigrationreference.blogspot.com/)





    reddymjm
    09-10 12:48 PM
    I thinkThis year will be good for EB3.
    With 700 per queter going to EB2I and EB2C, this means that EB2I will go only upto few months by Jul-2011 before the spill kicks IN.
    Once the spill over kicks in EB2 will move by atmost Jul-2007 (as there are won't be any 485 filed for India / China post 2007. Even if they are it is unlikely that they will be processed in 1 or 2 months). So I expect EB3 to use most of the spill over this year.

    CATCH: IF USCIS allows filing of 485 for POST 2007 FIASCO then the above doesn't hold true.
    Thats what exactly I said

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/1984591-post28.html





    vin13
    11-10 11:07 PM
    Guys..

    I have been watching and participating in this drama for a long time....

    We must go to court for the correct interpretation and enforcement of UNUSED VISA from ROW / undersubscribed catagories. THERE IS NO CASE FOR EVEN WAITING FOR ONE QUARTER. 20,000 VISA are available unused at a given time, they should ALL be immediately allocated to the guys in the Q.

    This will benefit all EB 2 / EB 3

    We really should not have any debate about loosing the case etc... Let us try and loose the case... At least , we will have the satisfaction of trying...

    If your are with me please respond to this thread

    We MUST take the advantage of low VISA usage in this recession and cut the line by tens of thousand

    Seriously guys,
    We worked on putting a draft letter to address quarterly spillover just yesterday. We even planned for a conference call. We ended up with just two of us. The draft letter is still out there in Donor forum:Quarterly spillover

    There is more talk than people wanting to really do something. We cannot get people to attend a conference call. How can we expect to mobilize to go to court?

    Here is the draft. See if some of you can use it to fight the cause.
    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    Dear Mr. Charles Oppenheim,
    First of all we would like to congratulate the administration for taking the right steps by changing the USCIS website and making detailed information available to the applicants. We would like to also thank the administration for proactively working on I485 cases and pre-adjudicating them.
    We are writing to get clarification regarding the law that control the unused VISA numbers falling across to other countries here after referred as �Spill-over� process. Looking at the VISA date movement over previous few years in last calendar quarter made us believe that Spill-over followed by USCIS is yearly and not quarterly.
    The law being referred as defined in Immigration and Nationality Act: Section ACT 202 - Numerical Limitation to any single foreign state under Sec. 202. [8 U.S.C. 1152]
    (3) Exception if additional visas available. - If because of the application of paragraph (2) with respect to one or more foreign states or dependent areas, the total number of visas available under both subsections (a) and (b) of section 203 for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who otherwise may be issued such a visa, paragraph (2) shall not apply to visas made available to such states or areas during the remainder of such calendar quarter.
    (5) 2/ RULES FOR EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS
    (A) EMPLOYMENT-BASED IMMIGRANTS NOT SUBJECT TO PER COUNTRY LIMITATION IF ADDITIONAL VISAS AVAILABLE- If the total number of visas available under paragraph (1), (2), (3), (4), or (5) of section 203(b) for a calendar quarter exceeds the number of qualified immigrants who may otherwise be issued such visas, the visas made available under that paragraph shall be issued without regard to the numerical limitation under paragraph (2) of this subsection during the remainder of the calendar quarter.
    (B) LIMITING FALL ACROSS FOR CERTAIN COUNTRIES SUBJECT TO SUBSECTION (e)- In the case of a foreign state or dependent area to which subsection (e) applies, if the total number of visas issued under section 203(b) exceeds the maximum number of visas that may be made available to immigrants of the state or area under section 203(b)consistent with subsection (e) (determined without regard to this paragraph),in applying subsection (e) all visas shall be deemed to have been required for the classes of aliens specified in section 203(b).
    Our interpretation of the Section 202(a)(5) of the Immigration and Nationality Act states that if total demand will be insufficient to use all available numbers in a particular Employment preference category in a *calendar quarter*, then the unused numbers may be made available without regard to the annual �per-country� limit. We feel that *quarterly Spill-over helps* both the administration as well as applicants.
    Quarterly Spill-over will benefit administration by:
    1) Steady VISA movement will increase visibility for the administration in turn will help administration to forecast forward movement of VISA dates.
    2) Spill-over when issued quarterly, effectively reduces/minimizes chances of visas wastages as the burden is not pushed at the end of fiscal year.
    3) Balanced workload for the immigration officers and card issue helping USCIS to better manage efficiently, as Spill-over is divided in 4 quarters, rather only in last quarter.
    4) Spill-over when issued quarterly means saving administrative effort, time and money in processing EAD, Advance parole applications for the petitioners who may get GCs as much as 9 months earlier and who are near Approval dates.
    5) Effective forward movement of VISA dates will give opportunity for potential applicants to file I-485 earlier, which in turn will bring steady new workload to administration.
    Quarterly Spill-over will benefit Applicants by:
    1) Existing applicants potentially will be able to get their permanent residencies 6-8 months in advance.
    2) New petitioners will be able to file their I-485, EAD and AP sooner due to Forward movement in VISA dates.
    3) Streamlined VISA movement helps retrogressed Applicants effectively estimate their approval dates to plan their future appropriately.
    As explained above by following quarterly Spill-over process as defined by law will be WIN-WIN for administration and applicants. We would appreciate your kind clarification/action on implementation of this existing rule. Thanks,



    No comments:

    Post a Comment