Wednesday, June 15, 2011

paris hilton butt

images gallery_main-paris-hilton- paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton
  • Paris Hilton



  • ajthakur
    07-14 06:50 PM
    How can you say dates will become current when I send the response.This could be a blessing for you.As your 485 file is now open depending upon your reply if IO is convinced he could easily mail out the GC to you as your dates would be current by the time he looks into your reply.Consult an attorney to frame a correct reply.
    Good luck.





    wallpaper Paris Hilton paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton lifted her skirt
  • Paris Hilton lifted her skirt



  • go_gc_way
    12-26 10:56 PM
    Dear New IV Members ...

    You can GREATLY HELP THIS EFFORT by throwing your ideas and contributing to this effort.

    Please update Web sites in your local areas. I have posted a classified in the following web site ..

    www.desigate.com that can be read at ... http://www.desigate.com/classified.php

    It took me less than 15 minutes to register and post the ad. But as you see it can not be done by one person, with every one's help , we can finish this effort in few days.

    We have approximately 7000 members , if we can post at least in 1000 different web sites/forums/groups , I am sure It will definetly help increase the membership toward 10,000.





    paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton#39;s ass cheek
  • Paris Hilton#39;s ass cheek



  • sheela
    10-16 07:14 PM
    It looks like someone just walked by put red dot with "." as comment to everyone. Gave one to me too... Just ignore. Its not important. More important is what exactly we want to do.

    Whatever we decide, lets finalize and start working on it. I remember famous quote from Walt Disney: "The best way to get something done is start doing it."

    I donot care but it simply tell some people are intelluctually bankrupt
    and use RED dots to block any healthy discussion on forum
    My suggestion: Come on and show your real worth rather than using red dots





    2011 Paris Hilton lifted her skirt paris hilton butt. place Paris Hilton shops.
  • place Paris Hilton shops.



  • Legal_In_A_Limbo
    03-10 09:11 AM
    Hi, Did you send the AC21 letter yourself? Can you please let us know the format of the letter and supporting documents you sent? Also, please share the format of G-28 explanation. How was your experience so far? Did you receive any confirmation back from USCIS? Thanks.

    meimmi, we are still working on it.
    might end up hiring a lawyer only for filling AC-21. I know its not a big deal, but still trying to be on the cautious side.

    We also had the same questions as u had and were not able to find anything.
    If you find anything please share it with us also. We are going to file this week for sure.



    more...


    paris hilton butt. especially in her utt.
  • especially in her utt.



  • eb3_nepa
    04-10 08:07 AM
    Instead of letting members open 4 different threads, it is best that IV core itself opens the thread in RED so that it catches people's eyes and they post their comments in one spot rather than 4. AND it helps highlight the fact the bulletin is actually out.





    paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton Butt Paris Hilton
  • Paris Hilton Butt Paris Hilton



  • gc_lover
    07-18 09:54 AM
    I checked with somebody who has hired Rajiv Khanna as his lawyer. He said that those who had filed in July are fine and there is no need to re-file it.

    I am still waiting to hear from my lawyer though.



    more...


    paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton and Doug
  • Paris Hilton and Doug



  • BharatPremi
    09-19 11:03 AM
    we made them understand the difference between legal and illegal immigration.

    Are you kidding or Are you seriously quoting this? Do you understand that very people you "made understood" are part of law making process? How can you say that they do not have understanding of "legal" and "illegal" immigration. Man, they are making the laws.





    2010 Paris Hilton#39;s ass cheek paris hilton butt. gallery_main-paris-hilton-
  • gallery_main-paris-hilton-



  • Indirant
    01-31 08:22 PM
    Hi,
    Good work Varsha, are we having the conf call today let us know.
    Thanks
    Sekar



    more...


    paris hilton butt. How did Paris Hilton lure
  • How did Paris Hilton lure



  • nixstor
    07-05 03:11 PM
    But I have been using murthy forums - which are free for a long long time...even before IV came along....talking abt quality...same kinda ppl post there....dont see any diff....

    I'm sure IV is doing a great job on something....but please do a little research before asserting that this is the only immigration forum in the world...

    Dont mean to start a p***ing contest here.... those who want to and can pay shd pay....but thinking that ppl will pay for the forums is not really a solution.

    No offense either. You cannot compare Murthy/Khanna forums with IV's. As long as you see IV just as a forum, you would not be able to make any distinction between IV & murthy/khanna forums. As I replied in another post, Murthy/Khanna get "invaluable" publicity that translates into clients shelling out $$$ in the long run. I hope you understand the difference.





    hair place Paris Hilton shops. paris hilton butt. it wasn#39;t Paris Hilton or
  • it wasn#39;t Paris Hilton or



  • Ramba
    07-04 07:25 PM
    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.



    more...


    paris hilton butt. paris hilton butt.
  • paris hilton butt.



  • pappu
    05-08 11:58 PM
    coopheal,
    I think it is a good idea, just contributed, thanks!

    insbaby we are unable to verify your contribution. Could you send us your transaction details, IV handle and the email used to contribute. We can check and get back to you if there was an error.





    hot especially in her utt. paris hilton butt. hot PARIS HILTON BUTT paris
  • hot PARIS HILTON BUTT paris



  • grinch
    02-14 04:44 PM
    thanks soulty for the ideas!

    Well guys, lets start submitting shall we?

    and the battle is currently OPEN



    more...


    house paris-hilton-jeans-utt-1.jpg paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton in Small Bikini
  • Paris Hilton in Small Bikini



  • ajju
    02-20 03:55 PM
    Ok guys before you shoot it down heres my calc for EB2 pending apps from 2000 to Dec 2003. Obviously its a rough estimate, who knows how many eb3s switched, labor subs etc etc etc.

    From pending apps from 2000 to 2003 dec are about 96. Assume represents 1% of total population so it would be 9600. Each app has about 1.5 dependents so about 15,000? If you assume as lower say 0.5% then number would obviously increase to 29,000.

    Ok now shoot me down.


    Good calculation... On brighter side.. if I assume being 2%.. the numbers would be 7500.. Hope its enough to clear out with just the extra EB1 quotas in this quarter.. And then, next quarter we see some more progress for EB2 India.. Just a wishful thinking...





    tattoo Paris Hilton Butt Paris Hilton paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton#39;s Got Ass
  • Paris Hilton#39;s Got Ass



  • indio0617
    11-22 10:40 AM
    Ok. Here is a question I have.

    I know one can get 3 years extensions once 140 is approved even with previous employer. The question is -

    Assume EB2 140 is approved for previous employer has PD June 2004, and then one changes the job. By the time his 6 years of H1B gets over, June 2004 becomes current. Now the person cannot file 485 since 140 was approved for old employe whom he has left an year back. Will the person still get 3 years of extension on H1B?

    I was thinking, u get 3 years extension due to retrogession.. so with the fact that PD is current, how will you still get 3 years of extension?

    Thanks.

    Yes. You are correct. 3 year extension after I-140 approvals can be granted only if you are unable to file for I-485. Things will be complicated in the scenario you outlined which would require some prior planning.

    It is all a big mess, forcing us to stay in this perpetually uncertain state, putting our lives on hold. Of course we all have a choice : factor out the GC from our career / life equation and move on without all the complexities. I guess we will see more and more people taking that route now given the gloomy scene on retrogession.



    more...


    pictures Paris Hilton and Doug paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton#39;s Ass Cheek
  • Paris Hilton#39;s Ass Cheek



  • pj1
    03-24 12:11 PM
    Hi,

    I am on an L1B visa which is valid till 2013.I want to know different options available if i wish to get an H1B visa.

    Thanks





    dresses hot PARIS HILTON BUTT paris paris hilton butt. Paris Hilton Shows Us Her Butt
  • Paris Hilton Shows Us Her Butt



  • sbeyyala
    01-17 03:10 PM
    signed up for $20 per month though paypal.



    more...


    makeup How did Paris Hilton lure paris hilton butt. paris-hilton-jeans-utt-1.jpg
  • paris-hilton-jeans-utt-1.jpg



  • invincibleasian
    01-31 06:17 PM
    I am actually looking for a very simple answer : My husband whose EB-2 I-140 had been approved some time back, wants to quit his job & pursue MBA on F-1. Would the I-539 be approved in this case ? Or should he plan for H4.
    BTW , he has no plans to travel out of country so stamping is not an issue.
    H4 is the best option. F1to h1 is a pain!





    girlfriend Paris Hilton#39;s Got Ass paris hilton butt. gallery_main-paris-hilton-
  • gallery_main-paris-hilton-



  • va_labor2002
    07-24 09:34 AM
    Any comments from Core team about this thread ?





    hairstyles paris hilton butt. paris hilton butt. 1123 paris hilton butt 001
  • 1123 paris hilton butt 001



  • insbaby
    05-07 11:10 AM
    If you have paid and do not have access then send us an email to info at immigrationvoice.org with your payment details, name, email used to contribute and IV ID.

    We have added everyone that contributed. Sometimes there is a delay of a couple of days.

    I saw couple of them last week, now I searching, searching and searching, not able to see donor forums on updates except one that says "start of the donor forums".

    Is there a link that shows all donor forums...





    chicago60607
    09-10 10:53 PM
    The above post quoting the Siskind's blog concurs with what I was told.
    Hey Yall,

    I just called the House Judiciary Committee to inquire about the webcast link not working and the reason sited was that "thats due to the hearing postponed until tomorrow".

    So, no more hearing for the day and it resumes tomorrow. I did forget to ask for what time it starts, may be someone else can check on it.





    sanju
    02-03 12:13 PM
    I spoke to Congresswoman Zoe Logfren's staff few days, back and they specifically pointed out on the country quota issue. I'm sure lot of lawmakers are aware about this issue, I wan to give it a try, guys who think it is an unfair system, please PM me, this is my own initiative so no there is no arguement on whether IV supports this or not...

    I did want to PM you, but thought of posting it on the open forum. So here is what I have to say.

    You are a total jerk because you do not understand, and you do not want to understand that your actions could annoy people and harm the effort. There is a time for everything. Just because we are all feeling the fear of the shrinking economy, doesn't mean that we have to do something, which may even harm the entire effort. Waiting for the right moment is better than doing wrong things at the wrong time and failing.



    .



    No comments:

    Post a Comment