Sunday, June 19, 2011

black stars clipart

images Royalty-free clipart picture black stars clipart. Star 171. lack clipart
  • Star 171. lack clipart



  • BharatPremi
    03-17 01:05 PM
    42% of all EB3 Green Card has priority date before December 2003!!! Man I am in deep Sh.. hmm trouble.. :eek:

    No 42% load is before June 2003 and before, in other words before July 2003.





    wallpaper Star 171. lack clipart black stars clipart. Roudel Black Star Red Circle
  • Roudel Black Star Red Circle



  • gc_on_demand
    11-11 07:51 AM
    he cant act on immigration when the economy is down and ppl are losing their jobs..so we are in a sinking boat...
    better to wait and watch!!!

    If we are in sinking boat then lets sink rather than try to survive.

    Guy is telling lets try to survive. Lets try.... Its far from success but towards it.





    black stars clipart. Transparent Star Black Face
  • Transparent Star Black Face



  • ita
    09-10 12:33 PM
    You can post. Just type the messages on the left hand side panel.

    Got it. Thank you.





    2011 Roudel Black Star Red Circle black stars clipart. To use any of the clipart
  • To use any of the clipart



  • desi3933
    02-03 01:02 PM
    Thanks desi3933, couple more questions...

    do I have to submit only the job offer letter?
    Should it be the old(one I originally got) one or get one from the employer saying I am currently employed as permanent for the same salary as in I140?
    Do I have to send the W2 from last year?
    Do I have to send 2 pay stubs from this year?


    Please read my post again.
    The letter is for future GC job, not for your current job.

    ____________________
    Not a legal advice.
    US Citizen of Indian Origin



    more...


    black stars clipart. Switzerland Black Stars Basel
  • Switzerland Black Stars Basel



  • Hope_GC
    07-16 08:02 PM
    I agree with you..

    I've so many hard working American friends... it really make me want to work harder to compete with them, but these bunch of cry babies at Numbers are scared of skilled workers, they don't want to upgrade their skills, they want to work 9-5 and get paid for their incompetencies.





    black stars clipart. Free Gold Star Clipart
  • Free Gold Star Clipart



  • pappu
    06-10 03:50 PM
    OPPOSE the Sanders-Grassley-Harkin amendment S.AMDT.4319 in bill H.R.4213 which severely hurts Competitiveness, Innovation and creating jobs in America



    It will only take less then 1 minute of your time to click this link ImmigrationVoice.org - Advocacy -- OPPOSE the Sanders-Grassley-Harkin amendment S.AMDT.4319 in bill H.R.4213 which severely hurts Competitiveness, Innovation and creating jobs in America (http://immigrationvoice.capwiz.com/immigrationvoice/issues/alert/?alertid=15130466)

    and send the message out.


    Please post this link on other forums and mail to friends asking them to join this action item.

    Text of the Amendment on IV Wiki: http://immigrationvoice.org/wiki/index.php/US_Congress#Immigration_related_legislation.2C_con gressional_action_and_regulatory_actions



    more...


    black stars clipart. The final lion clipart comes
  • The final lion clipart comes



  • delax
    07-14 07:17 PM
    Murthy will never mention Immigrationvoice or our effort on her website.
    Murthy will always want to take credit for everything good even if she has no hand in it. She tried to take credit for the June bulletin. But she vanished when the July fiasco happened. Why did she not take credit for the July fiasco if she was so close to DOS and was so easily able to influence the June bulletin. It is publicity stunt of these lawyers and their websites to try to show off how influencial they are so that their clients are simply awed by them and give dollars to them as fees.
    I want to ask Murthy this question-- How much money has she given to Immigrationvoice till now?
    If she has not given any money, then it means she does not care about immigrants and this cause. It means she wants retrogression to stay so that she can make quick bucks off it.


    My friend - I think I need to send you a flower :)

    To a few of my misguided friends who seem to not understand the distinction between a lobbying outfit whose goal is to change existing law to better suit reality and a law firm whose goal is to work within existing law. As self-proclaimed proponents of "Gandhigiri" - I see its principles not being applied when dealing with each other. Is Gandhigiri meant only to show USCIS. Would the Mahatma have said the same things mentioned above before asking himself a few questions. I dont think we can question the motives and intention of anybody before fully knowing the facts. As a client of Murthy Law Firm here is a fact:

    On her call last week for her clients, she mentioned that the Murthy Law Firm is one of the biggest financial contributor to AILF - who by the way are ready to file the class action lawsuit. If the lawsuit is successfull and given AILF's funding source - will you exclude yourself from the potential benefit because Murthy's funds were used to support the litigation - who's piggybacking now.

    Again - Its not one against the other - Please bear in mind the DUE PROCESS of LAW has been violated by USCIS resulting in a curtailment of your substantive rights (EAD, Parole, AC21 etc). I would not care who fights on my behalf so long as the outcome is to correct the earlier mistake.

    If you feel that she does not work for immigrants you have no locus standi to avail of ANY BENEFIT from the lawsuit and as a true proponent of "Gandhigiri" you should VOLUNTARILY exclude yourself from any such potential benefit.

    I know the Mahatma would have done the same thing.





    2010 Transparent Star Black Face black stars clipart. Royalty-free clipart picture
  • Royalty-free clipart picture



  • grinch
    03-14 07:30 AM
    If ya'll do like a character model contest next time, I think I will be in. But we will need like a 4 week due date...lol. Good job all.

    Sounds good 3d, I'll actually look toward a battle like that.

    It'll be my first character project, but I'll be looking foward to it.



    more...


    black stars clipart. Dashed Star | Grey star with
  • Dashed Star | Grey star with



  • webm
    06-20 03:01 PM
    Congratulations!!! Survu,Mallu both..


    -------------------------------------
    PD EB3-Ind Oct,2001





    hair To use any of the clipart black stars clipart. free heart clipart images.
  • free heart clipart images.



  • chanduv23
    09-02 12:32 AM
    All the NJ members - it is very critical that you all attend the rally. As this chapter has been lying dormant for a while, we decided to merge this into the tri state and a lot of NJ members are in the tri state chapter. Those of you who have not joined the tri state chapter, please do so by joining the tri state chapter at

    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/immigrationvoiceny/

    We are also in need of volunteers to help us in the flyer campaign in the tri state area with main focus on New Jersey.

    Please vote your willingness to attend the rally at

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12872

    Also if you want to ride the bus please visit the thread

    http://immigrationvoice.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12567

    Please PM me or tnite or mpadapa or singhsa3 if you want to volunteer for action items.



    more...


    black stars clipart. lack and white clip art
  • lack and white clip art



  • singhsa3
    03-05 07:08 PM
    Thank You Kutra and Pegaus03
    I will keep folks posted on the direction this campaign is taking.





    hot Switzerland Black Stars Basel black stars clipart. Marian Star clip art
  • Marian Star clip art



  • gconmymind
    07-14 06:36 PM
    Is it possible they are trying to adjudicate my 485. I am EB2 India PD: JAN 2006.

    The reason there is an RFE and not a NOID means USCIS is trying to adjudicate your application. Depends what action they take on your response..my 2 cents



    more...


    house View Full Size black stars clipart. lack stars clipart. lack
  • lack stars clipart. lack



  • newbee7
    07-05 12:58 AM
    "Although USCIS stated in its 2006 Annual Report Response (at p. 8) that it provides detailed data to DOS, the tri-agency group identified gaps in USCIS’ data. Through these discussions, the Ombudsman learned that accounting and processing methods differ at the Nebraska and Texas Service Centers (where USCIS processes employment-based petitions)."

    http://www.dhs.gov/xlibrary/assets/CISOMB_Annual%20Report_2007.pdf





    tattoo Free Gold Star Clipart black stars clipart. Clip Art Free Pictures. clip
  • Clip Art Free Pictures. clip



  • diptam
    07-14 11:20 AM
    Murthy sent the letter after LOGICLIFE declared that something GOOD is likely or on the way.... IV is doing the job and she is getting the fruit (money)by just publishing it. When the lawsuit issue came up she took U-turn saying its AILA's job...

    When i first came to US , i worked with a guy who used to Publish the results of my hardwork without even mentioning my name and get promotion. When i went to him for my promotion he said this year's promotion quota has exhausted .

    Anyway i left that company and those kind thiefs ( who steal credit for other work) long back but the distressing memory of exploitation hasn't left my mind.



    Murthy will never mention Immigrationvoice or our effort on her website.
    Murthy will always want to take credit for everything good even if she has no hand in it. She tried to take credit for the June bulletin. But she vanished when the July fiasco happened. Why did she not take credit for the July fiasco if she was so close to DOS and was so easily able to influence the June bulletin. It is publicity stunt of these lawyers and their websites to try to show off how influencial they are so that their clients are simply awed by them and give dollars to them as fees.
    I want to ask Murthy this question-- How much money has she given to Immigrationvoice till now?
    If she has not given any money, then it means she does not care about immigrants and this cause. It means she wants retrogression to stay so that she can make quick bucks off it.



    more...


    pictures The final lion clipart comes black stars clipart. lack stars clipart.
  • lack stars clipart.



  • SunnySurya
    07-03 09:28 PM
    May I suggest the following reservations:
    20% Other Backward Countries (OBC)
    15% Scheduled Countries (SC)
    15% Scheduled Territories (ST)
    5% Kins of the armed forces
    Remaining 55% for Highly Skilled people





    dresses Marian Star clip art black stars clipart. #29101 Royalty-free Black And
  • #29101 Royalty-free Black And



  • amsgc
    12-21 10:35 PM
    Lazycis,

    For academic info:

    You mentioned that 245(k) allows up to 180 "out of status". Does it also cover "unlawful presence"? If not, then what does?

    I am getting a bit confused by the terminlogy. I understand that "out of status" impiles: Your I-94 has not expired, but you have violated the terms under which you were admitted.
    And "unlawful presence" means you overstayed your I-94, or sneaked in.

    Is this correct? Please clarify.

    Thanks,
    Ams



    more...


    makeup Dashed Star | Grey star with black stars clipart. View Full Size
  • View Full Size



  • ganguteli
    02-03 11:00 AM
    In the current economic environment, removing country quota seems like the only argument that can fly, since it does not increase actual visas.

    In the current economic envireonment where H1Bs are being blamed in media do you think anything can fly. There is so much anti-India sentiment in the softare industry due to consulting companies. Do you think they will want more Indians as greencard holders? Think about it?

    I think the first step should be to do a media campaign and clear all negative publicity H1Bs are getting. Second, all of us working for consulting companies and feel they are exploited need to come out and file lawsuits against employers and clean the system. If there is no exploitation and it is only a misinformation campaign by anti-immigrants then we need to clear that wrong too so that foriegn workers get their due recognition for helping this economy grow.





    girlfriend Clip Art Free Pictures. clip black stars clipart. 37732-Clipart-Illustration-Of-
  • 37732-Clipart-Illustration-Of-



  • actaccord
    02-07 03:58 PM
    donate 25000 Hilton points (accumulated for future vacation use but this is more important :-) ) , worth one night stay close to DC (10miles) or two night stay (25 miles from DC). This stay can be shared by 2 or 3 ppls. Also, I can take care of picking you from hotel to DC and back to hotel.





    hairstyles lack and white clip art black stars clipart. Star Clipart
  • Star Clipart



  • delhiguy
    07-04 08:03 PM
    Excellent

    I agree with you 100 % , I believe having excessive media coverage and lawsuits , would bring the GC number and process in the open , and most americans would oppose the GC as they oppose H1B.

    If i was a american i would surely be happy with USCIS/DOS creating so much trouble for the immigrants to my country , who i believe are taking my job.

    Everyone blaming CIS/DOS needs to understand some basics behind this mess. Before going to conclude anything, first, one should read all the ombudsman reports for last 3 or 4 years. Former INS or current USCIS�s functions and operations were not questionable and not known to public till ombudsman office was established. Ombudsman has helped customers and keep helping to improve efficiency of CIS. Ombudsman main concern (or goal) have been over the 4 years are

    1. Primarily reducing backlogs in any application type particularly 485 and timely approval of any application.

    2. Abolish the need for interim benefits like EAD, AP etc. If they approve 485 in 6 months, then most of us do not require EAD and AP.

    3. Reduce the wastage of EB visas, as unused EB visas can not be carried over to next year (use it or lose it). Since 1992, about 200,000 EB visas were lost permanently. In 2003 alone, they issued only 64,000 EB visas and lost 88,000.

    The recent report to congress, the ombudsman scolded the CIS left and right for its inefficiency and highlighted how many EB visas were lost for ever, in last 10 years despite the very heavy demand for employment based green cards. Based on his report, both CIS and DOS try to obey the direction of ombudsman and modifying the 485 adjudication procedure. The reason for loss of EB visas in previous years not only due to inefficiency in processing the 485s on time, it is also due to lengthy background check delay by FBI, where USCIS has no control. For example, in 2003 they could approve about 64,000 485s only. It is partially due to USCIS inefficiency and partially due to lengthy FBI check. There are 300,000 (AOS+ Naturalization applicants) cases are pending with FBI for name check. Out of which, about 70,000 cases are pending more than 2 years. Out of 300,000 victims of name check delay, how many are really threat to the country? Perhaps none or may be few! Remember that lot of Indians also victims of name check and all the victims of name check delay already living in USA.

    The big problem is the timing when USCIS takes the visa number for a 485 applicant. Till 1982, INS took visa number for a 485 applicant as soon as they receive the application. Visa number assigned to a 485 applicant without processing his/her application. He/She may not be a qualified applicant to approve 485. Still they assign to them. If they found, the applicant is ineligible, they suppose to return the number back to DOS. However, this practice was modified after 1982. USCIS is taking visa number only at the time of approval of 485, after processing the 485 for a lengthy period. For some people, particularly victims of name check, 485 processing time vary between 2 to 5 years. Though, it is a good practice it is not the ideal or efficient process, due to name check delay. Let us assume about 150,000 are victim of name check in 2003. If they assigned all the numbers to these 150,000 applicants at the time they filed 485, the 88,000 visa numbers might have not been lost in 2003. Now what happens, those who filed 485 in 2003 (victim of name check delay) will take EB numbers from 2007 or 2008 quota, if FBI clears his/her file in 2007 or 2008. This will push back those who are going to file 485 in 2007 or 2008.

    That why, ombudsman in his 2007 yearly report to Congress recommended to practice the old way of assigning visa number to 485 applicants, to minimize the loss of visa numbers.

    Now lets come to July Visa bulletin mess.

    Because of tight holding of visa cutoff dates for EB3 and EB2 for the first 8 months of 2007 (From Oct 2006 to May 2007) USCIS approved only 66,000 485s. For the next 4 months they have about 60K to 70K numbers available. If they approve the pending 485s with slower speed or old cut off dates, there is a potential estimated loss of 40,000 EB visas by Sep 2007. Thats why, based on ombudsman recommendation, DOS moved considerably the cut off date for June. When they took inventory in May, there are about 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications were pending due to non-availability of visa numbers. The �documentarily qualified 485 applications� mean the application filed long time back and processed by USCIS and cleared the FBI name and criminal check, and found eligible for green card. Apart from 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications, there is thousands of 485 applications (documentarily not yet qualified) pending due to name check. When DOS checked with USCIS they found only 40,000 documentarily qualified 485 applications (in all EB categories put together) are pending. However, the available visas are more than 40,000 (60to 70K). Then they made with out consulting properly with USCIS they made �current� for all EB categories. This is how they determine �current� or �over-subscribed� and how they establish cutoff dates.

     If there are sufficient numbers in a particular category to satisfy all reported documentarily qualified demand, the category is considered �Current.�

     Whenever the total of documentarily qualified applicants in a category exceeds the supply of numbers available for allotment for the particular month, the category is considered to be �oversubscribed� and a visa availability cut-off date is established.

    There is nothing wrong with DOS to make all categories �current� for a July bulletin as per they definition of demand vs supply estimation to meet the numerical limitations per year. Perhaps the DOS did not aware of other impact of making all categories �current� ie fresh guys entering into I-485 race. Because of �current� there will be additional tons and tons of new filings. The rough estimation is about 500K to 700K new 485s and same amount of EAD and AP applications will be filed in July. But the available number is just 60K, and there are already 40K documentarily qualified 485s are pending more than 6 months to 3 years to take the numbers from remaining 60K pool. That leaves just 20K to fresh 485 filings. If 700K new 485 filed in July, it will choke the system. People have to live only in EAD and AP for next 5 to 10 years.

    For example, an EB3-Indian whose LC approved through fast PERM on July 30th 2007, can apply 140 and 485 on July 31st 2007 as per July visa bulletin. For his PD, it will take another 10 years for the approval of 485. During this 10 year period, he/she has to live in EAD and AP and need to go for finger print every 15 month.

    Therefore by making �current� for all EB categories is a billion dollar mistake by both DOS and CIS first part.. Another mistake is timing of rectifying mistake. USCIS and DOS and law firms should have discussed immediately about the potential chaos about making current and rectified move the cut-off to reasonable period to accommodate additional 20K 485s. If they modified the VB, with in couple of days after July 13, then there wont be a this much stress, time and wastage of money.

    There is nothing wrong in issuing additional advisory notice or modified visa bulletin to control the usage of visa numbers. The only mistake both USCIS and DOS is made is the timing of issuance of modified visa bulletin or advisory notice. It indicates poor transparency in the system and bad customer service. Now, they used all 140K visas this year. Assigning remaining 20K visa numbers to already pending 485s which are not yet documentarily (name check delayed cases) qualified is not the violation of law. It was old practice. In fact, ombudsman recommends it. They have the trump card which is Ombudsman report and recommendations. Therefore they are immune to lawsuit. Therefore, filing the law-suit is not going to help. The only two mistakes I see is 1) making all categories as �current� in June 13 and second is modifying VB only on July 2.

    My recommendation is to IV is capitalize the situation in constructive way. Law suit only bring media attention with the expense of money and time. The constructive approach is getting an immediate interim relief by legislation to recapture unused visas in previous years to balance the supply vs demand difference.





    Madhuri
    01-16 03:17 PM
    Just set up monthly $20 contribution from my bank account.





    downthedrain
    02-03 10:31 AM
    Thanks desi3933, couple more questions...

    do I have to submit only the job offer letter?
    Should it be the old(one I originally got) one or get one from the employer saying I am currently employed as permamenet for the same salary as in I140?
    Do I have to send the W2 from last year?
    Do I have to send 2 paystubs from this year?



    No comments:

    Post a Comment